Association of Lactate Dehydrogenase and C-reactive Protein Levels as Predictors of Respiratory Failure in Covid-19

Background and Aim: Inflammatory markers reproduce amount of disease development or revival. They are used to assess improvement or worsening of the illness. Hence the aim of the study was to determine the correlation of laboratory markers (LDH and CRP) and oxygen requirement with clinical severity in Covid 19 subjects. Material(s) and Method(s): There were 216 subjects admitted to the emergency department of the hospital. The incorporated subjects were divided into two groups: group I subjects had covid19 pneumonia and in group 2 subjects did not have covid 19 pneumonia. Blood count and serum values of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were quantified in all subjects enrolled in the research. An automated hematology analyzer was utilized to perform blood count according to the manufacturer's protocol. Serum samples were analyzed on a fully automated clinical chemistry Instrument. Result(s): LDH was amplified in 82% of subjects, CRP resulted elevated in 98% of subjects, only 21% of subjects presented pathological values of white blood cell (WBC), but 18% had a neutrophils count above the upper normal range value, while 89% of subjects had lymphocytes count below the lower normal range value, as formerly reported. Conclusion(s): LDH and CRP could be helpful for the premature identification of subjects who are at elevated risk for acute respiratory failure. They should be considered a helpful test for the early recognition of subjects who need closer respiratory monitoring and more aggressive supportive therapies to avoid poor prognosis. These subjects could be benefited from a quick hospitalization, a closer observation and correct treatments. Copyright © 2022, Dr Yashwant Research Labs Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved.

COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF LABORATORY TESTING IN AL ZAHRAA TEACHING HOSPITAL, AL NAJAF AL-ASHRAF, IRAQ.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: To develop a quantitative tool to identify the cost and benefits of the appropriate and inappropriate laboratory tests. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study, conducted in Al Zahraa teaching hospital for children's health and maternity in a period between March 2021 to March 2022. We study the total laboratory investigation done in three years; before the COVID-19 era (1-3-2018 to 1-3-2019) and two consecutive years (1-3-2020 to 1-3-2021 and 1-3-2021 to 1-3-2022) to exclude the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the results. And try to divide these test numbers according to each hospital department and the position of the test ordering doctor (senior or junior). We compare the total number of laboratory investigations with the total patient seeking medical care in Al Zahraa hospital, out or inpatient, i.e., ORDERING INDEX. Also, we calculate the (AVERAGE ORDERING INDEX) by dividing the number of all ordered tests by one specific test. RESULTS: Results: The total number of laboratory tests ordered in three (pre and peri COVID-19 pandemic) years show a significant increment in the last year (78249, 73600, and 1740249) respectively. Test ordering index, in the same way, shows significant increments over years (0.65, 0.64 Aand11.2) respectively. Biochemistry investigations constitute the largest proportion (50%) of all investigations that have been ordered last year. CBC is the most commonly ordered single test, in outpatient clinics, it is done 19510 times (Obstetrics and Gynecology 11850 vs Pediatric 7660). The positive (abnormal) results were only 4.8%. CONCLUSION: Conclusion: For more and more years, laboratory investigations have been overused. A large number of normal results indicate that the test order was chosen at random. The most commonly overused test is the complete blood count.

Biomarkers in COVID-19: An Up-To-Date Review.

The ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) poses several challenges to clinicians. Timely diagnosis and hospitalization, risk stratification, effective utilization of intensive care services, selection of appropriate therapies, monitoring and timely discharge are essential to save the maximum number of lives. Clinical assessment is indispensable, but laboratory markers, or biomarkers, can provide additional, objective information which can significantly impact these components of patient care. COVID-19 is not a localized respiratory infection but a multisystem disease caused by a diffuse systemic process involving a complex interplay of the immunological, inflammatory and coagulative cascades. The understanding of what the virus does to the body and how the body reacts to it has uncovered a gamut of potential biomarkers. This review discusses the different classes of biomarkers - immunological, inflammatory, coagulation, hematological, cardiac, biochemical and miscellaneous - in terms of their pathophysiological basis followed by the current evidence. Differences between children and adults are highlighted. The role of biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) is reviewed. The correlation of biomarkers with clinical and radiological features and the viral load, temporal evolution and the effect of treatment remain to be studied in detail. Which biomarker needs to be evaluated when and in whom, and how best this information can contribute to patient care are questions which currently lack convincing answers. With the evidence currently available broad guidelines on the rational use of available biomarkers are presented. Integrating clinical and laboratory data, monitoring trends rather than a single value, correlating with the natural course of the disease and tailoring guidelines to the individual patient and healthcare setting are essential.

Comparative analysis of clinical characteristics, imaging and laboratory findings of different age groups with COVID-19.

Objective: This study aims to provide scientific basis for rapid screening and early diagnosis of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) through analysing the clinical characteristics and early imaging/laboratory findings of the inpatients. Methods: Three hundred and three patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from the East Hospital of People's Hospital of Wuhan University (Wuhan, China) were selected and divided into four groups: youth (20-40 years, n = 64), middle-aged (41-60 years, n = 89), older (61-80 years, n = 118) and elderly (81-100 years, n = 32). The clinical characteristics and imaging/laboratory findings including chest computed tomography (CT), initial blood count, C-reactive protein [CRP]), procalcitonin (PCT) and serum total IgE were captured and analysed. Results: (1) The first symptoms of all age groups were primarily fever (76%), followed by cough (12%) and dyspnoea (5%). Beside fever, the most common initial symptom of elderly patients was fatigue (13%). (2) Fever was the most common clinical manifestation (80%), with moderate fever being the most common (40%), followed by low fever in patients above 40 years old and high fever in those under 40 years (35%). Cough was the second most common clinical manifestation and was most common (80%) in the middle-aged. Diarrhoea was more common in the middle-aged (21%) and the older (19%). Muscle ache was more common in the middle-aged (15%). Chest pain was more common in the youth (13%), and 13% of the youth had no symptoms. (3) The proportion of patients with comorbidities increased with age. (4) Seventy-one per cent of the patients had positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction results and 29% had positive chest CT scans before admission to the hospital. (5) Lesions in all lobes of the lung were observed as the main chest CT findings (76%). (6) Decrease in lymphocytes and increase in monocytes were common in the patients over 40 years old but rare in the youth. Eosinophils (50%), red blood cells (39%) and haemoglobin (40%) decreased in all age groups. (7) The proportion of patients with CRP and PCT elevation increased with age. (8) Thirty-nine per cent of the patients had elevated IgE, with the highest proportion in the old (49%). Conclusion: The clinical characteristics and imaging/laboratory findings of COVID-19 patients vary in different age groups. Personalised criteria should be formulated according to different age groups in the early screening and diagnosis stage.